Create PEFT README.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
# Fine-Tuning Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
This folder contains a generic fine-tuning pipeline designed to support multiple PEFT fine-tuning strategies.
|
||||
|
||||
## Features
|
||||
|
||||
- **Supported Fine-Tuning Strategies**:
|
||||
- **Full Fine-Tuning**: Adjusts all parameters of the model during training.
|
||||
- **[Linear Probing](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.11939)**: Fine-tunes only the residual blocks and the embedding layer, leaving other parameters unchanged.
|
||||
- **[LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09685)**: A memory-efficient method that fine-tunes a small number of parameters by decomposing the weight matrices into low-rank matrices.
|
||||
- **[DoRA (Directional LoRA)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09353v4)**: An extension of LoRA that decomposes pre-trained weights into magnitude and direction components. It uses LoRA for directional adaptation, enhancing learning capacity and stability without additional inference overhead.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
### Fine-Tuning Script
|
||||
The provided finetune.py script allows you to fine-tune a model with specific configurations. You can customize various parameters to suit your dataset and desired fine-tuning strategy.
|
||||
|
||||
Example Usage:
|
||||
|
||||
```zsh
|
||||
source finetune.sh
|
||||
```
|
||||
This script runs the finetune.py file with a predefined set of hyperparameters for the model. You can adjust the parameters in the script as needed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Available Options
|
||||
Run the script with the --help flag to see a full list of available options and their descriptions:
|
||||
```zsh
|
||||
python3 finetune.py --help
|
||||
```
|
||||
Script Configuration
|
||||
You can modify the following key parameters directly in the finetune.sh script:
|
||||
Fine-Tuning Strategy: Toggle between full fine-tuning, LoRA \[`--use-lora`\], DoRA [\[`--use-dora`\]], or Linear Probing \[`--use-linear-probing`\].
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Comparison
|
||||
The figure below compares the performance of LoRA/DoRA against Linear Probing under the following conditions:
|
||||
|
||||
<img width="528" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6c9f820b-5865-4821-8014-c346b9d632a5">
|
||||
|
||||
- Training data split: 60% train, 20% validation, 20% test.
|
||||
- Benchmark: context_len=128, horizon_len=96
|
||||
- Fine-tuning: context_len=128, horizon_len=128
|
||||
- Black: Best result.
|
||||
- Blue: Second best result.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user