Karim shoair
29 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
29 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
# Performance Benchmarks
|
|
|
|
Scrapling isn't just powerful - it's also blazing fast. The following benchmarks compare Scrapling's parser with the latest versions of other popular libraries.
|
|
|
|
### Text Extraction Speed Test (5000 nested elements)
|
|
|
|
| # | Library | Time (ms) | vs Scrapling |
|
|
|---|:-----------------:|:---------:|:------------:|
|
|
| 1 | Scrapling | 2.02 | 1.0x |
|
|
| 2 | Parsel/Scrapy | 2.04 | 1.01 |
|
|
| 3 | Raw Lxml | 2.54 | 1.257 |
|
|
| 4 | PyQuery | 24.17 | ~12x |
|
|
| 5 | Selectolax | 82.63 | ~41x |
|
|
| 6 | MechanicalSoup | 1549.71 | ~767.1x |
|
|
| 7 | BS4 with Lxml | 1584.31 | ~784.3x |
|
|
| 8 | BS4 with html5lib | 3391.91 | ~1679.1x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Element Similarity & Text Search Performance
|
|
|
|
Scrapling's adaptive element finding capabilities significantly outperform alternatives:
|
|
|
|
| Library | Time (ms) | vs Scrapling |
|
|
|-------------|:---------:|:------------:|
|
|
| Scrapling | 2.39 | 1.0x |
|
|
| AutoScraper | 12.45 | 5.209x |
|
|
|
|
> All benchmarks represent averages of 100+ runs. See [benchmarks.py](https://github.com/D4Vinci/Scrapling/blob/main/benchmarks.py) for methodology.
|