Present video gen provider options with costs to user, don't auto-pick

Agent must show a provider comparison table (quality, speed, cost per
clip) and recommend one, but let the user choose.
This commit is contained in:
calesthio
2026-04-04 13:18:15 -07:00
parent 1451f4fd69
commit 97097e61a1
+16 -6
View File
@@ -217,12 +217,22 @@ Use this structure for each variant:
- Sound design: [any special audio needs]
**Duration:** [X seconds]
**Estimated cost:** $[X.XX] breakdown:
- Image generation: $X.XX (N images × $X.XX each via [provider])
- Video generation: $X.XX (N clips × $X.XX each via [provider])
- TTS narration: $X.XX (N words via [provider])
- Music: $X.XX ([source])
- Total: $X.XX
**Estimated cost per provider option:**
Present a provider comparison table so the user can choose:
```
Provider Quality Speed Cost (N clips) Total
───────── ──────── ───── ────────────── ─────
VEO 3.1 Highest Slow $X.XX $X.XX
Kling Pro High Medium $X.XX $X.XX
Sora V2 High Medium $X.XX $X.XX
LTX Distilled Lower Fastest $X.XX $X.XX
```
+ Image generation: $X.XX (N images × $X.XX each via [provider])
+ TTS narration: $X.XX (N words via [provider])
+ Music: $X.XX ([source])
**Do NOT pick the provider for the user.** Present the options with
costs, recommend one with a brief reason, and let them decide.
**Honest assessment:** [What this will look like realistically — don't oversell]