3.7 KiB
Creative Intake
Before the research stage, gather user intent through targeted questions. Do NOT start production on a vague brief.
Required Questions (ask conversationally, not as a survey)
- Purpose: What is this video FOR? (educate, sell, inspire, document, entertain)
- Audience: Who will watch it? (age, expertise, context — "my team" vs "YouTube public")
- Platform: Where will it live? (YouTube, internal Slack, social media, presentation, website)
- Tone: What should it FEEL like? (serious, playful, cinematic, raw, warm, provocative)
- References: Any videos you admire or want this to feel like?
- Outcome: What should the viewer DO or FEEL after watching?
- Constraints: Budget ceiling? Timeline? Must-include content?
How to Ask
Don't dump all 7 questions at once. Start with purpose and audience, then let the conversation flow. Fill in gaps naturally.
If the user gives a detailed brief, skip questions they've already answered.
Identify what the user has already told you. If they said "I want a cinematic brand film for Instagram," you already have purpose (inspire/sell), platform (Instagram), and tone (cinematic). Ask what's missing.
Handling Vague Briefs
When the user says something like "make me a video about X":
- Acknowledge the topic — show you understood.
- Ask the single most important missing question first (usually purpose or audience).
- Based on their answer, ask the next most important gap.
- Stop asking when you have enough to start research. You don't need perfect answers — research will fill in details.
Handling Detailed Briefs
When the user provides a multi-paragraph brief or a document:
- Summarize what you understood (1-2 sentences).
- Call out any gaps: "I have a clear picture of the audience and tone, but I'd love to know — is there a specific outcome you're hoping for?"
- Confirm the platform and constraints if not stated.
Output
Produce an intake_brief (informal, not schema-validated) that the
research stage uses as its starting context. Include:
- Direct quotes from the user where their language reveals intent
- Explicit answers to each of the 7 questions (mark any that were inferred vs stated)
- Any reference videos/images the user mentioned
- Constraints that must be honored (budget, timeline, must-include)
The intake_brief is passed as context to the research-director, not as a formal artifact. It exists to prevent the research stage from inventing intent that the user never expressed.
Handling Reference Video Input
When the user provides a video URL or file as their starting point:
-
Read the video-reference-analyst skill (
skills/meta/video-reference-analyst.md) and follow its protocol. Do not proceed with standard creative intake. -
The VideoAnalysisBrief replaces the need for most intake questions — it provides tone, structure, pacing, audience signals, and style information directly from the reference.
-
The remaining intake questions are:
- What topic/subject for YOUR version? (if different from reference)
- How long?
- Narration yes/no?
- Budget ceiling?
-
Do NOT ask "what should it feel like?" — the reference video IS the answer to that question. Extract tone from the VideoAnalysisBrief instead.
What NOT To Do
- Do not present a numbered survey. This is a conversation, not a form.
- Do not ask questions the user already answered in their initial message.
- Do not delay production unnecessarily — if the brief is clear, move on.
- Do not invent answers for questions the user didn't address. Mark them as "not specified" and let the research stage handle ambiguity.
- Do not assume the user wants an explainer. Many users want cinematic, animation, or source-led work. Listen for signals.