Add reference video input analysis workflow

This commit is contained in:
calesthio
2026-04-04 10:01:11 -07:00
parent 87df43d39f
commit b0917d2d84
25 changed files with 2640 additions and 5 deletions
+20
View File
@@ -55,6 +55,26 @@ The intake_brief is passed as context to the research-director, not as a
formal artifact. It exists to prevent the research stage from inventing
intent that the user never expressed.
## Handling Reference Video Input
When the user provides a video URL or file as their starting point:
1. **Read the video-reference-analyst skill** (`skills/meta/video-reference-analyst.md`)
and follow its protocol. Do not proceed with standard creative intake.
2. The VideoAnalysisBrief replaces the need for most intake questions — it provides
tone, structure, pacing, audience signals, and style information directly from the
reference.
3. The remaining intake questions are:
- What topic/subject for YOUR version? (if different from reference)
- How long?
- Narration yes/no?
- Budget ceiling?
4. Do NOT ask "what should it feel like?" — the reference video IS the answer to that
question. Extract tone from the VideoAnalysisBrief instead.
## What NOT To Do
- Do not present a numbered survey. This is a conversation, not a form.